preface to ICOMOS Charter by Th. J. Maarleveld
On October 9 1996 the General Assembly in Sofia has ratified the ICOMOS Charter on the Protection and Management of Underwater Cultural Heritage. The charter was prepared by the International Committee on the Underwater Cultural Heritage (ICUCH).
The charter is important for more than one reason. In a very short time technical developments have opened up the submerged and under water world. Until then traces and remains of human activity had been let undisturbed. Sea-level changes, continuous interaction between man and nature and intensive use of water-transport for the distribution of goods, people and ideas have caused an archaeological record of tremendous wealth to accumulate under water.
As this wealth suddenly becomes accessible this causes major bedazzlement. The importance of underwater sites is recognized half-heartedly and their value is assessed from limited and often quite inappropriate criteria. This leads to large-scale treasure-hunting as well as to well-intended but no less destructive antiquarianism. All over the world the problems seem to be alike. Governments don't know how to react. They have no tools to distinguish between archaeological research and unrestrained collection of antiquities and take decisions that have been unthinkable in land-archaeology for over a century. The ICOMOS Charter tries to fill this gap and to provide the decision-makers with criteria.
Also, there is a second reason why the Charter is important. Archaeological heritage management is in strong development. In many countries its growth and related stresses is accompanied by some sort of liberalization and commercialization of archaeological institutions, firms or companies. In consequence the archaeological profession is in need of criteria for codes of practice in an unprecedented way. Internationally The UNESCO Recommendation on International Principles Applicable to Archaeological Excavations (New Delhi, 5 December 1956), The ICOMOS Charter for the Protection and Management of the Archaeological Heritage (Lausanne, 1990) and the new ICOMOS Charter on the Protection and Management of Underwater Cultural Heritage offer a consistent and rather comprehensive set of codes to which professionals and heritage organizations can commit themselves or on which they can base their own, more stringent codes of practice.
A third reason why the Charter is important is very international in nature. As ICOMOS, UNESCO is very concerned about the irresponsible exploitation of cultural heritage in international waters. No single state can be held responsible in those areas. It is the responsibility of humankind as a whole, or in a more practical sense, the responsibility of the joint UNESCO Member States. In order to make Member States agree and in order to prepare an international convention UNESCO was in great need of a statement from the professional heritage world. The Charter serves that purpose.
End of preface.
The Charter reads as follows:
(ICOMOS = The International Council of Monuments and Sites)
Sofia, 9 October 1996
This Charter is intended to encourage the protection and management of underwater cultural heritage in inland and inshore waters, in shallow seas and in the deep oceans. It focuses on the specific attributes and circumstances of cultural heritage under water and should be understood as a supplement to the ICOMOS Charter for the Protection and Management of the Archaeological Heritage, 1990. The 1990 Charter defines the 'archaeological heritage' as that part of the material heritage in respect of which archaeological methods provide primary information, comprising all vestiges of human existence and consisting of places relating to all manifestations of human activity, abandoned structures, and remains of all kinds, together with all the portable cultural material associated with them. For the purposes of this Charter, underwater cultural heritage is understood to mean the archaeological heritage which is in, or has been removed from, an underwater environment. It includes submerged sites and structures, wreck-sites and wreckage and their archaeological and natural context .
By its very character the underwater cultural heritage is an international resource. A large part of the underwater cultural heritage is located in an international setting and derives from international trade and communication in which ships and their contents are lost at a distance from their origin or destination.
Archaeology is concerned with environmental conservation; in the language of resource management, underwater cultural heritage is both finite and non-renewable. If underwater cultural heritage is to contribute to our appreciation of the environment in the future, then we have to take individual and collective responsibility in the present for ensuring its continued survival.
Archaeology is a public activity; everybody is entitled to draw upon the past in informing their own lives, and every effort to curtail knowledge of the past is an infringement of personal autonomy. Underwater cultural heritage contributes to the formation of identity and can be important to people's sense of community. If managed sensitively, underwater cultural heritage can play a positive r˘le in the promotion of recreation and tourism.
Archaeology is driven by research; it adds to knowledge of the diversity of human culture through the ages and it provides new and challenging ideas about life in the past. Such knowledge and ideas contribute to understanding life today and, thereby, to anticipating future challenges.
Many marine activities, which are themselves beneficial and desirable, can have unfortunate consequences for underwater cultural heritage if their effects are not foreseen. Underwater cultural heritage may be threatened by construction work that alters the shore and seabed or alters the flow of current, sediment and pollutants. Underwater cultural heritage may also be threatened by insensitive exploitation of living and non-living resources. Furthermore, inappropriate forms of access and the incremental impact of removing 'souvenirs' can have a deleterious effect. Many of these threats can be removed or substantially reduced by early consultation with archaeologists and by implementing mitigatory projects. This Charter is intended to assist in bringing a high standard of archaeological expertise to bear on such threats to underwater cultural heritage in a prompt and efficient manner.
Underwater cultural heritage is also threatened by activities that are wholly undesirable because they are intended to profit few at the expense of many. Commercial exploitation of underwater cultural heritage for trade or speculation is fundamentally incompatible with the protection and management of the heritage. This Charter is intended to ensure that all investigations are explicit in their aims, methodology and anticipated results so that the intention of each project is transparent to all.
Article 1 Fundamental Principles
The preservation of underwater cultural heritage in situ should be considered as a first option.
Public access should be encouraged.
Non- destructive techniques, non-intrusive survey and sampling should be encouraged in preference to excavation.
Investigation must not adversely impact the underwater cultural heritage more than is necessary for the mitigatory or research objectives of the project.
Investigation must avoid unnecessary disturbance of human remains or venerated sites.
Investigation must be accompanied by adequate documentation.
Article 2 Project design
Prior to investigation a project design must be prepared, taking into account:
The project design should be revised and amended as necessary.
Investigation must be carried out in accordance with the project design. The project design should be made available to the archaeological community.
Article 3 Funding
Adequate funds must be assured in advance of investigation to complete all stages of the project design including conservation, report preparation and dissemination. The project design should include contingency plans that will ensure conservation of underwater cultural heritage and supporting documentation in the event of any interruption in anticipated funding.
Project funding must not require the sale of underwater cultural heritage or the use of any strategy that will cause underwater cultural heritage and supporting documentation to be irretrievably dispersed.
Article 4 Time-table
Adequate time must be assured in advance of investigation to complete all stages of the project design including conservation, report preparation and dissemination. The project design should include contingency plans that will ensure conservation of underwater cultural heritage and supporting documentation in the event of any interruption in anticipated timings.
Article 5 Research objectives, methodology and techniques
Research objectives and the details of the methodology and techniques to be employed must be set down in the project design. The methodology should accord with the research objectives of the investigation and the techniques employed must be as unintrusive as possible.
Post-fieldwork analysis of artefacts and documentation is integral to all investigation; adequate provision for this analysis must be made in the project design.
Article 6 Qualifications, responsibility and experience
All persons on the investigating team must be suitably qualified and experienced for their project roles. They must be fully briefed and understand the work required.
All intrusive investigations of underwater cultural heritage will only be undertaken under the direction and control of a named underwater archaeologist with recognized qualifications and experience appropriate to the investigation.
Article 7 Preliminary investigation
All intrusive investigations of underwater cultural heritage must be preceded and informed by a site assessment that evaluates the vulnerability, significance and potential of the site. The site assessment must encompass background studies of available historical and archaeological evidence, the archaeological and environmental characteristics of the site and the consequences of the intrusion for the long term stability of the area affected by investigations.
Article 8 Documentation
All investigation must be thoroughly documented in accordance with current professional standards of archaeological documentation.
Documentation must provide a comprehensive record of the site, which includes the provenance of underwater cultural heritage moved or removed in the course of investigation, field notes, plans and drawings, photographs and records in other media.
Article 9 Material conservation
The material conservation programme must provide for treatment of archaeological remains during investigation, in transit and in the long term.
Material conservation must be carried out in accordance with current professional standards.
Article 10 Site management and maintenance
A programme of site management must be prepared, detailing measures for protecting and managing in situ underwater cultural heritage in the course of and upon termination of fieldwork. The programme should include public information, reasonable provision for site stabilization, monitoring and protection against interference. Public access to in situ underwater cultural heritage should be promoted, except where access is incompatible with protection and management.
Article 11 Health and safety
The health and safety of the investigating team and third parties is paramount. All persons on the investigating team must work according to a safety policy that satisfies relevant statutory and professional requirements and is set out in the project design.
Article 12 Reporting
Interim reports should be made available according to a time-table set out in the project design, and deposited in relevant public records.
Reports should include:
Article 13 Curation
The project archive, which includes underwater cultural heritage removed during investigation and a copy of all supporting documentation, must be deposited in an institution that can provide for public access and permanent curation of the archive. Arrangements for deposition of the archive should be agreed before investigation commences, and should be set out in the project design. The archive should be prepared in accordance with current professional standards.
The scientific integrity of the project archive must be assured; deposition in a number of institutions must not preclude reassembly to allow further research. Underwater cultural heritage is not to be traded as items of commercial value.
Article 14 Dissemination
Public awareness of the results of investigations and the significance of underwater cultural heritage should be promoted through popular presentation in a range of media. Access to such presentations by a wide audience should not be prejudiced by high charges.
Co-operation with local communities and groups is to be encouraged, as is co-operation with communities and groups that are particularly associated with the underwater cultural heritage concerned. It is desirable that investigations proceed with the consent and endorsement of such communities and groups.
The investigating team will seek to involve communities and interest groups in investigations to the extent that such involvement is compatible with protection and management. Where practical, the investigating team should provide opportunities for the public to develop archaeological skills through training and education.
Collaboration with museums and other institutions is to be encouraged. Provision for visits, research and reports by collaborating institutions should be made in advance of investigation.
A final synthesis of the investigation must be made available as soon as possible, having regard to the complexity of the research, and deposited in relevant public records.
Article 15 International co-operation
International co-operation is essential for protection and management of underwater cultural heritage and should be promoted in the interests of high standards of investigation and research. International co-operation should be encouraged in order to make effective use of archaeologists and other professionals who are specialised in investigations of underwater cultural heritage. Programmes for exchange of professionals should be considered as a means of disseminating best practice.
Back to Nordic Underwater Archaeology